Why won't this get changed?
- If one were to change the desired definition from excessive to a static #, this would hurt the #of votes Alora receives on the top lists.
How Come?
- Players would be forced to look at the desired rule enforced by these top lists, which is 1 vote per user!
End result?
- Players no longer use their own intuition to decide what an unfair advantage is.
Why do they currently use their own intuition?
- The punishment for getting caught is simply a vote book wipe.
Important Point! Can players use the current system to massively gain an advantage? (No, this gets flagged)
Important nuance : Staff are often forced into a position where they have to answer this question, how should they respond? I've got no clue.
Alora currently takes on all the liability through the term excessive advantage.
BUT HERE IS THE KICKER, the term excessive advantage is also along side the note that this is punishable and could cause termination, meaning Alora recognizes the limit, and is only forced to prove they are enforcing it. This is easily done by filtering out the mass abusers as a signal of compliance.