Jump to content


Photo

TP Tax Re-appropriation



  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

Posted 02 July 2024 - 05:16 PM #1

Real Alan
Realism

Real Alan
Posts: 876
Likes: 1,140
Clan: Realists



  •  Member since:
    07 Jun 2019

    • Time spent:
      75d 2h 57m 26s

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards

  •  98 bugs found

What is your suggestion?:

Change the way the TP selects which items to buy & destroy

 

Currently: it's buying high end items that are on sale (over a certain % of the average traded price

 

Like: this torva item is listed at 50% off from the average traded price  -> TP decides to buy it up 

 

Suggested change: buy gear items based on how actively traded they are

 

Is this in OSRS?:

No

 

Has this suggestion been accepted already?:

No

 

How would this benefit Alora?:

This would help stabilize the economy.

You could take 10 billion gp and buy up 10 torva items (affecting 10 people) 

Or...

You could take 10 billion gp and buy up all the commonly traded pking items under X price (affecting the whole server)

 

This would help stabilize the lootation and risks of pking.  

No one wants to get a max kill and wait a week to cash out.

Or get ripped off to insta-cash out.  

 

Commonly traded pking items 

Toxic staff of the dead / crossbows / amulet of fury / barrows pieces / spirit shield / tome of fire / mage's book / spec weapons / pvp equipment

Buying out these relatively low price items would be more bang for your buck in terms of impact on the game than buying out expensive-ass endgame items like these.

45597f52dbd28268e7a63dd551ddc418.png

 

 

Example of a problem with the current system

 

Consider a drop rate buff like the one applied to nightmare.

More supply of these items -> price drops -> TP waste tax money buying out these items and trying to stabilize a price that's meant to drop (because the drop rate was lowered).


rCjd36m.gif

779858f92372b65448411ebb99ae2454.gif

Community Awards

186389e1c9f184e3f3b56b038179afd0.png

 

Spoiler

Content

467021453b22f2e55b6161e34fc517a3.png

Topic 89500 - My Problem with Staff

Topic 89503 - My Problem with Staff II

Topic 89512 - My Problem with Staff III

Accomplishments

b238e051c524997fa395f7b94120f707.png

17f0b0f3326931f82ad4b16c654cbca8.png

ed4359218fa2f48adc03ffb7aabeb9ce.png

f0db828700bca6a0f649a8675bd8d2ff.png

Spoiler

Game Suggestions

Pet Timeline

4053bef497bbaee8b3db94aec03237ed.png

Spoiler

Posted 02 July 2024 - 06:07 PM #2

VARlANT
Classic

VARlANT
Posts: 138
Likes: 112



  •  Member since:
    07 Oct 2021

    • Time spent:
      18d 1h 51m 2s

  •  Previous username:
    Variant

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards

  •  16 bugs found

 

What is your suggestion?:

Change the way the TP selects which items to buy & destroy

 

Currently: it's buying high end items that are on sale (over a certain % of the average traded price

 

 

 

although i like your suggestion, i don't believe this is true, or if it is then the current system is bugged. It doesn't take into account the average traded price at all, i believe it just has a random list of items and when that item pops, itll buy that item at whatever price it's listed at. 

 

Inq skirt for example, its average trade price was no where near 1.7b, but it paid that when you can see the last 2 trades were significantly lower:

FiZuv6Z.png

 

W9y12e4.png

 

I do agree that more emphasis needs to be put on lower tier items, not pk specific, but cerberus boots, zenyte jewlery, gwd drops, and things along those lines would make all the difference, but still include torva, masori, etc just at a less frequent rate (since those items also tend to flood the market if it isn't controlled).

 

I also believe any amount of gp we can use to contribute to the item consumption device would be a net positive for everyone


u1DQZht.png

XoJ7oDS.png

5de43a7a6a1f80dd402f6d2a0d6c4879.pngaf23707ae47836d5d96e7170934243fb.png

VRK1wjX.png


Posted 02 July 2024 - 06:39 PM #3

Real Alan
Realism

Real Alan
Posts: 876
Likes: 1,140
Clan: Realists



  •  Member since:
    07 Jun 2019

    • Time spent:
      75d 2h 57m 26s

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards

  •  98 bugs found

although i like your suggestion, i don't believe this is true, or if it is then the current system is bugged. It doesn't take into account the average traded price at all, i believe it just has a random list of items and when that item pops, itll buy that item at whatever price it's listed at.    Inq skirt for example, its average trade price was no where near 1.7b, but it paid that when you can see the last 2 trades were significantly lower:
 

 

Perhaps the average trade price was 2b 

 

It sees the 1b and 600m offers -> views it as 50% and 70% off -> makes the purchase

Then it sees 1.7b offer as 15% off -> decides this is still a solid deal and continues to make the purchase

 

Perhaps the reason it sees the price as 2b is because the items are not actively traded on TP so the price history and average prices are inflated.

 

Either way, I agree there's something wrong with the current system.  


rCjd36m.gif

779858f92372b65448411ebb99ae2454.gif

Community Awards

186389e1c9f184e3f3b56b038179afd0.png

 

Spoiler

Content

467021453b22f2e55b6161e34fc517a3.png

Topic 89500 - My Problem with Staff

Topic 89503 - My Problem with Staff II

Topic 89512 - My Problem with Staff III

Accomplishments

b238e051c524997fa395f7b94120f707.png

17f0b0f3326931f82ad4b16c654cbca8.png

ed4359218fa2f48adc03ffb7aabeb9ce.png

f0db828700bca6a0f649a8675bd8d2ff.png

Spoiler

Game Suggestions

Pet Timeline

4053bef497bbaee8b3db94aec03237ed.png

Spoiler

Posted 03 July 2024 - 01:23 AM #4

Mhu
Veteran

Mhu
Posts: 273
Likes: 198
Clan: Ice




  •  Member since:
    12 Apr 2022

    • Time spent:
      31d 2h 57m 20s

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards

  •  7 bugs found

Agreed with the suggestion, TP consumption should buy more cheaper items like zenyte jewelery, prims etc, since we have way too many of them in game.


Posted Image





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


This topic has been visited by 40 user(s)