12 replies to this topic

[LAST RIDE]

What is your suggestion?:

'The Guns' pet is obtainable by a chance at the moment by using vote books, my suggestion is basically change the way to get him, from vote books to get from voting and claiming the auth code.

 

Is this in OSRS?:

Not sure

Has this suggestion been accepted already?:

Could not find anything about

 

How would this benefit Alora?:

Would be better if you wish the pet and need money or want to sell the vote book, so you don't need to use him.

Also I think the vote number would be increased a little by someway.

[Not Shadow]

No Support. obv,

 

Why would that be changed ? it doesn't make any sense.

 

If you wanna get the pet spend the vbooks in effort to get the pet.

[beans n cake]

NO Support. Choose to have money or chance at pet

[LAST RIDE]

NO Support. Choose to have money or chance at pet

 

No Support. obv,

 

Why would that be changed ? it doesn't make any sense.

 

If you wanna get the pet spend the vbooks in effort to get the pet.

With all due respect, I don't agree it should be like this to be honest, your main reward from voting is the vote book, so I believe you should have a chance to get the pet by voting, and not from using the vote books, which u can easily buy from tp.

[A BJ]

NO support. the 'Guns' pet is a nice little pet on top of the bonuses that you already receive from the books. I see no reason that the chances should be doubled to receive the pet since its supposed to be a bonus for opening the books.

[Middle Brian]

I have a biased opinion on this. I will remain neutral UNTIL I see how more people feel. I agree because some ironmen modes are limited on how many vote books they can use. I literally vote when I want bonus XP or when I want to raid so this is more of an incentive. I also don't agree because I am sure not many people have this pet and the ones that do (like myself), would feel we got cheated.

[LAST RIDE]

NO support. the 'Guns' pet is a nice little pet on top of the bonuses that you already receive from the books. I see no reason that the chances should be doubled to receive the pet since its supposed to be a bonus for opening the books.

The chances would not be doubled, my suggestion is remove the way to get him from vote books, and make him obtainable from voting and claiming auth code.

Making him obtainable from voting would make more sense since its a voting pet, you'd have a chance to get him every 12 hours/every time you claim the auth code, and not from vote books which u can buy.

[MT]

I understand where you are coming from. While it does make sense to get 'The Guns' pet by voting (putting in your auth code), why deny the ability for people who purchase vote books the ability to obtain the pet? Even if you do not get the pet when you open vote books, you still get different sorts of bonuses to choose from when you have 2FA active. 

 

Besides that, your suggestion is more or less encouraging players to buy/sell auth codes for more chances at the pet. This is a risk as there's a possibility to get scammed in such exchanges.

 

No support.

[Gp]

I think the viability of this depends on the amount that two groups vote. Group 1: People hunting the pet. Group 2: People selling votes for cash. I think group 2 vote more than group 1 and by implementing this suggestion you would lower the price of vote books causing less incentive for people to sell votes.... Then again I might be completely wrong about those assumptions. No support tho.

[Almighty Ty]

See where your coming from but like everyone else has said its just simply not something that needs to be changed! NO SUPPORT

[Middle Brian]

Forgot to mention, would also be nice for The Guns pet to be added to the collection log of pets.

[Blinkdemon5]

No support, simply because I've spent a little over 1b on vote books just trying to get the bastard but have yet to actually receive it. If it was only from voting, I wouldn't even bother to do it tbh.

[Kharyrll]

Your suggestion has been declined, if you feel this was wrongfully done please contact a Forum Moderator+.