Jump to content


Photo

Lock CB skill XP ( Slight Money Sink)



  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
10 replies to this topic

Posted 04 October 2019 - 07:42 AM #1

GIM Josh
Group Ironman

GIM Josh
Posts: 5
Likes: 1



  •  Member since:
    12 Jan 2019

    • Time spent:
      3d 1h 32m 40s

  •  Total level:
    2,194

  •  1 bugs found

So I seen some different pure builds, but not too many. I think if we made it so we could lock our combat xp, say 50m per skill, but still allow us to see the xp drop from the hit. So say if I lock my attack xp as a 75 attack 1 def pure, and i ags spec, but herpy derpy switched so to attack xp and hit a number. Not so bad, but over time I could level up without noticing. 

 

As of right now if you lock your combat xp, you don't receive xp drops. This isn't too big of a deal imo (could be wrong) that could motivate some people to try pking out, and would be a better gold sink up front as the 1.5m gold to reset ain't much and I've only had to do it once in my pking adventures as a pure.

 

Edit: And if you want to unlock the xp lock, it could cost 10m. I'm iffish on this tho cuz it might discourage people from locking if they are not sure about the investment.



Posted 04 October 2019 - 08:07 AM #2

Dab
Veteran

Dab
Posts: 737
Likes: 741
Location: #Paragoon


  •  Member since:
    13 Jan 2019

    • Time spent:
      134d 7h 27m 56s

  •  Previous username:
    GIM Dab

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards

  •  44 bugs found

I only support for this idea for PKers because they are the only ones who need to see the XP drop. But I really don't see this as any sort of money sink, should just be implemented regardless.


Posted Image

Posted Image


Posted 04 October 2019 - 09:45 AM #3

Trii
Elite Ironman

Trii
Posts: 372
Likes: 203



  •  Member since:
    04 May 2018

    • Time spent:
      19d 9h 27m 43s

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards

  •  1 bugs found

I agree with @gim dab, it should be implemented without being a money sink.


Black Golem is my favorite pet.

'Love the night & it's stars, The moon is my witness.'

Hardcore_ironman_chat_badge.png?a1753 Grd

Ultimate_ironman_chat_badge.png?5bb1bSnK


Posted 04 October 2019 - 09:51 AM #4

beans n cake
Donator

beans n cake
Posts: 780
Likes: 538
Clan: Aftermath


  •  Member since:
    26 Apr 2019

    • Time spent:
      164d 22h 33m 30s

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards
Support. Can see this being super annoying for the pure community and agree with above. Shouldn't cost anything, not an advantage just almost a qol update for pures

Gimbeans.gif

Scythe.png

unknown.png

unknown.png

unknown.png

unknown.png

GIM Goals
Spoiler

Posted 04 October 2019 - 09:56 AM #5

Not Mhk
Veteran

Not Mhk
Posts: 473
Likes: 1,231
Clan: Paragon closer



  •  Member since:
    13 Sep 2017

    • Time spent:
      192d 21h 44m 24s

  •  Previous username:
    Mhk

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards

  •  11 bugs found
There’s no reason locking xp should cost money, the “showing xp drop while xp is locked” has been on the accepted suggestion list forever but there’s never been that big of a pure community to really get momentum for it but I would like to see it.
Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted 04 October 2019 - 10:42 AM #6

MT
Veteran

MT
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 3,601
Clan: #ICE




  •  Member since:
    26 Sep 2018

    • Time spent:
      120d 12h 9m 46s

  •  Previous username:
    Moral Truth

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards

  •  9 bugs found

Don't agree there should be a cost for players to do this. Like what @Mhk said, it's been suggested before and accepted without any sort of implementation yet.


KyqkXZi.png

Signature by Dr Dee Are E



Promoted to Server Support on November 7th, 2018.

Promoted to Server Moderator on January 1st, 2019.

Demoted from Server Moderator on May 10th, 2019.

Promoted to Server Support on June 2nd, 2019.

Resigned from Server Support on July 15th, 2020.



Official Alora Rules


Support Section | Appeal | Bug Report | Player Report

2FA Setup | Vote | Guides | Updates | Knowledge Base | Highscores



All Accounts

Spoiler


Community Awards

Spoiler

Posted 04 October 2019 - 02:06 PM #7

Konar
Group Ironman

Konar
Posts: 263
Likes: 348
Clan: ICE




  •  Member since:
    11 Jan 2019

    • Time spent:
      33d 51m 41s

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards

Yeah, I can support this without the gp cost


Posted Image

Posted Image


Posted 04 October 2019 - 03:44 PM #8

Iron baaail
Ironman

Iron baaail
Posts: 139
Likes: 77



  •  Member since:
    23 Jan 2017

    • Time spent:
      3d 13h 33m 46s

  •  Total level:
    2,167

so i support this aswell.



Posted 05 October 2019 - 09:52 AM #9

Apex Vee
User

Apex Vee
Posts: 10
Likes: 5


  •  Member since:
    13 Sep 2019

    • Time spent:
      1d 16h 12m 49s

  •  Previous username:
    Zerker Vee

  •  Total level:
    2,128

support this idea. I agree with it having some sort of associated cost. It is on the pvp'er to pvp tactically so that he doesnt gain xp in unwanted cb styles. With no money sink, it allows a 75 atk pure to camp on a whip to pk. I think there should be some associated price for that benefit.



Posted 11 October 2019 - 09:39 AM #10

Snakelings
Donator

Snakelings
Posts: 47
Likes: 40
Clan: Dynasty


  •  Member since:
    11 Dec 2018

    • Time spent:
      16d 13h 20m 13s

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards
I support this. I agree with the no cost as well, there should be no reason that pures have to deal with this issue I’m sure it would bring around more pkers as well.

e3623efbc964a95db340419f31c47e1d.pngc8e8a522d3f9d3a57992294381398687.png
hJueu19.png
lr5EffT.png
iSuVIJa.png
839ca4cf4b63c47e9724f525d82ea8f9.png


Posted 01 February 2024 - 08:24 PM #11

H

Administrator

H
Posts: 505
Likes: 2,597




  •  Member since:
    25 Nov 2021

    • Time spent:
      256d 21h 26m 2s

  •  Previous username:
    2OO8

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards

x8kpiEt.png


Your suggestion has been accepted.


uewjOiY.gif

XlQGKk3.png

Spoiler




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


This topic has been visited by 53 user(s)