Jump to content


Photo

Realism Values within Gamble Hosting



  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
2 replies to this topic

Posted 27 July 2019 - 11:28 PM #1

Master Real
User

Master Real
Posts: 4
Likes: 7



  •  Member since:
    21 Jul 2019

    • Time spent:
      1d 21h 23m 57s

  •  Total level:
    293
    Awards

  •  1 bugs found

Hey Alora! Quick suggestion here to deal with Values based on Normal players vs Ironman, Classic, GIM, and Realism players.

 

My suggestion is that Realism, Classic, GIM and Ironman players should NOT have to follow Normal player price values.

 

Example: As a Realism  Gamble Host ( rank 1 = 100m limit ), I would NOT be able to host a Bond because in Normal Mode, it is valued at 120m, But in Realism it is valued at 30M ( which is NOT over my limit ). 

 

There are only 2 ways to fix this matter, and help this suggestion.

 

1) Create a rule Stating that All modes MUST follow Normal Game play mode while hosting other modes.

 

2) Let each mode have their own price value.

 

As owner of the server and each game mode, I think it's fair if @Omicron decides this in the end.



Posted 27 July 2019 - 11:29 PM #2

Solivagant
Realism

Solivagant
Posts: 62
Likes: 95



  •  Member since:
    20 Apr 2019

    • Time spent:
      12d 23h 40m 47s

  •  Total level:
    1,871

Please dont bring ur gambling shit to realism holy fuck lol stay on normie



Posted 28 July 2019 - 12:05 AM #3

Groot
Group Ironman

Groot
Posts: 21
Likes: 158
Clan: Guthix
Location: The Forest




  •  Member since:
    08 Jan 2019

    • Time spent:
      11d 12h 57m 50s

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards

We do have this.....

fe5b37a805998580d0975075a2a65feb.png
https://gyazo.com/fe...0975075a2a65feb

 

You're literally just looking for a way to up your "minimum bet" as betting 3 Realism Bonds = 90m. Where as 1 Normie Bond = 110-130m, therefore twisting your realism minimum bet to a newer economy. Also abusing the fact that Realism and Normies can Xfer Bonds back and forth to each other.

 

This would create a huge dismantlement of the value of Bonds overall period.


Your suggestion has been declined, if you feel this was wrongfully done please contact a Forum Moderator+.


Posted Image





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


This topic has been visited by 58 user(s)