Jump to content


Photo

AFKing - Why it should be a rule



  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
8 replies to this topic

Posted 25 February 2017 - 06:58 PM #1

Zoo
Ironman

Zoo
Posts: 40
Likes: 12
Location: Massachusetts, USA



  •  Member since:
    21 Feb 2017

    • Time spent:
      2d 7h 35m 15s

  •  Total level:
    1,914

The more popular the server gets, the more crowded certain areas get (Wyverns, Cyclops, other common slayer areas). Most of these areas give both good/useful drops as well as provide an area that is currently AFKable. My suggestion is basically to make a rule to outlaw AFKing. It's frustrating to be trying to progress and actively play Alora with so many users just AFKing commonly assigned slayer monsters.

 

Thoughts?

 

Edit: Could be solved by introducing an NPC aggression timer that prevents NPCs in a certain area from auto-attacking after ~15minutes?


Z50WIut.png


Posted 25 February 2017 - 07:01 PM #2

Turban eater
User

Turban eater
Posts: 241
Likes: 108
Clan: invite me
Location: forums


  •  Member since:
    08 Feb 2017

    • Time spent:
      21d 2h 1m 51s

  •  Total level:
    1,116

Yeah man add even more rules with loopholes that get you fucked in the end even though you're doing nothing wrong.

 

Picture this, you go to kill something, and while you're killing it you don't notice the message a staff member is typing to you. You get punished, why? because you weren't replying. How do you prove you weren't afk? you can't unless you're recording 24/7, which most people aren't.

 

No support at all to add more rules when the ones set in place already are so unclear and unfair.


deba24ca14ff45e1b2d2a4a3a69fe6fe.png

6bdc6c50eb604668b7e58442e5784a63.png

35ea302edaf44b78917bd26f388d19de.png

cb80681a50844afb8e673004f3fbf9bd.png

06d2490a8b6547daa3c5032ba4857a66.png

7cd1a904f103403ea74f403df7b44c93.png


Posted 25 February 2017 - 07:12 PM #3

Zoo
Ironman

Zoo
Posts: 40
Likes: 12
Location: Massachusetts, USA



  •  Member since:
    21 Feb 2017

    • Time spent:
      2d 7h 35m 15s

  •  Total level:
    1,914

Yeah man add even more rules with loopholes that get you fucked in the end even though you're doing nothing wrong.

 

Picture this, you go to kill something, and while you're killing it you don't notice the message a staff member is typing to you. You get punished, why? because you weren't replying. How do you prove you weren't afk? you can't unless you're recording 24/7, which most people aren't.

 

No support at all to add more rules when the ones set in place already are so unclear and unfair.

So, couldn't the staff member send them Home so they can AFK away from the monsters and stop auto-retaliating? Perhaps an introduction of a auto-retaliate timer should be sooner rather than later.


Z50WIut.png


Posted 25 February 2017 - 07:15 PM #4

Turban eater
User

Turban eater
Posts: 241
Likes: 108
Clan: invite me
Location: forums


  •  Member since:
    08 Feb 2017

    • Time spent:
      21d 2h 1m 51s

  •  Total level:
    1,116

So, couldn't the staff member send them Home so they can AFK away from the monsters and stop auto-retaliating? Perhaps an introduction of a auto-retaliate timer should be sooner rather than later.

That is a possibility, yes. Although I still wouldn't support it, as there are many other scenarios that could occur where the player would be wrongfully accused and punished. Sorry. Good luck with this thread. If you wish to discuss further, feel free to PM me. I don't want to get another forum warning because staff can't handle the truth.


deba24ca14ff45e1b2d2a4a3a69fe6fe.png

6bdc6c50eb604668b7e58442e5784a63.png

35ea302edaf44b78917bd26f388d19de.png

cb80681a50844afb8e673004f3fbf9bd.png

06d2490a8b6547daa3c5032ba4857a66.png

7cd1a904f103403ea74f403df7b44c93.png


Posted 25 February 2017 - 07:27 PM #5

Flipper
User

Flipper
Posts: 713
Likes: 319
Clan: CLC
Location: England


  •  Member since:
    13 Nov 2016

    • Time spent:
      57d 20h 59m 22s

  •  Total level:
    2,118
    Awards

  •  3 bugs found

A rule for being AFK against a monster is utterly stupid, in my opinion. As @ Turban eater said, there are many other scenarios that could occur where the player would be wrongfully punished. If I was to be killing hellhounds and I quickly needed to run downstairs, I don't expect to have to teleport home / log out of the game just to do so. I expect to be able to run downstairs and leave my game how it is, taking the risk of death for being afk and not taking the risk of being punished for something so minor and silly.

 

The best way to do this, as you suggested in the edit, would be to have a timer which would cause npc's to stop being aggressive after being in that area for a certain amount of times. Although this is still iffy.

 

Out of all the times I've trained slayer. I believe I'm 22M experience. I have never gone to a spot to say "Wow, it's too crowded to train here."


flip2.png


Posted 25 February 2017 - 07:34 PM #6

Daltino
Super Donator

Daltino
Posts: 153
Likes: 72
Location: IL


  •  Member since:
    14 Nov 2016

    • Time spent:
      20d 19h 18m 27s

  •  Total level:
    2,277

  •  1 bugs found

lol they banned ragging n now ppl tryin ban afkin... whats next.... bank standing?


76561197998364433.png

 


Posted 25 February 2017 - 08:16 PM #7

Zoo
Ironman

Zoo
Posts: 40
Likes: 12
Location: Massachusetts, USA



  •  Member since:
    21 Feb 2017

    • Time spent:
      2d 7h 35m 15s

  •  Total level:
    1,914

I think you're all missing what I said? Nowhere in my suggestion did I say anyone should be banned. I am proposing a rule against AFKing (that could result in a staff member sending the user back Home), or the introduction to an aggression timer.


Z50WIut.png


Posted 25 February 2017 - 08:19 PM #8

Daltino
Super Donator

Daltino
Posts: 153
Likes: 72
Location: IL


  •  Member since:
    14 Nov 2016

    • Time spent:
      20d 19h 18m 27s

  •  Total level:
    2,277

  •  1 bugs found

I think you're all missing what I said? Nowhere in my suggestion did I say anyone should be banned. I am proposing a rule against AFKing (that could result in a staff member sending the user back Home), or the introduction to an aggression timer.

I was mainly making the reference how banning ragging was dumb and if this is done, more dumb rules will cont. to be suggested and added.


76561197998364433.png

 


Posted 21 April 2017 - 09:38 AM #9

Blank
Master Donator

Blank
Posts: 163
Likes: 953
Clan: Faded XIII
Location: Around, somewhere.


  •  Member since:
    25 Aug 2016

    • Time spent:
      143d 15h 32m 58s

  •  Total level:
    2,277
    Awards

Your suggestion has been declined, if you feel this was wrongfully done please contact a Forum Moderator+.


belgio#7777

 

 

Website Link

 

 

 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


This topic has been visited by 20 user(s)